Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 174, 2025
2025 7th International Conference on Biotechnology and Biomedicine (ICBB 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03006 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Technologies and Methodologies in Biomedical Research | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202517403006 | |
| Published online | 12 May 2025 | |
- FENG Y, YAO Y, YANG X. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, S0022-3913(21): 702－722 [Google Scholar]
- CHEN C K, YUH D Y, HUANG R Y, et al. Accuracy of implant placement with a navigation system, a laboratoryguide, and freehand drilling [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(6): 1213-1218 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hama DR, Mahmood BJ. Comparison of accuracy between free-hand and surgical guide implant placement among experienced and non-experienced dental implant practitioners: an in vitro study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2023 Oct; 53(5): 388-401. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2204700235. Epub 2023 Apr 24. PMID: 37154109; PMCID: PMC10627737. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinckfuss S, Conrad HJ, Lin L, Lunos S, Seong WJ. Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon’s experience on the accuracy of implant placement. J Oral Implantol. 2012; 38:311–323. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, Ryan J. Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):92-99. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5004. Epub 2016 Sep 19. PMID: 27643585. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 30. PMID: 26452429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Flügge, Tabea, et al. “Digital implantology—a review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery. Part II: Prosthetic set-up and virtual implant planning”. BMC Oral Health, vol.22, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02057-w. [Google Scholar]
- Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Aug;26(8):882-890. doi: 10.1111/clr.12414. Epub 2014 May 19. PMID: 24837492. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raabe, Clemens, et al. “Accuracy of keyless vs drillkey implant systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery using two guide-hole designs compared to freehand implant placement: an in vitro study.” International journal of implant dentistry 9.1 (2023): 4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Putra RH, Yoda N, Iikubo M, Kataoka Y, Yamauchi K, Koyama S, Cooray U, Astuti ER, Takahashi T, Sasaki K. Influence of bone condition on implant placement accuracy with computer-guided surgery. Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Sep 20;6(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00249-z. PMID: 32951152; PMCID: PMC7502099. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Quispe-López N, Flores-Fraile J, Pardal-Peláez B, Delgado-Martínez J, Montero J. Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Guided Surgery: An In Vitro Trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Jan- Feb;38(1):120-129. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9794. PMID: 37099581. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z, Liu Y, Xie X, Deng F. Influence of bone density on the accuracy of artificial intelligence-guided implant surgery: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Feb;131(2):254-261. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.019. Epub 2022 Apr 22. PMID: 35469649. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jorba-García A, González-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, et al. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(5): 2479-2494. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian Tian, Zhang Zhihong, Liu Honghong. Effects of different registration methods on the accuracy of navigation registration in dental implants [J]. International Journal of Stomatology. 2020, 47(02): 196-201. [Google Scholar]
- Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, et al. Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017, 32(1): 92-99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ozan O, Orhan K, Turkyilmaz I. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(5): 1755-1761. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yanjun Ge, Xiaoqiang Liu, Yong Wang. Clinical Application and Prospects of Dynamic Navigation System in Oral Implantology J. Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2020, 13(8): 449- AccessDate. DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2020.08.001. [Google Scholar]
- Romandini, Mario, et al. “Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta‐analyses on flapless fully guided surgery”. Periodontology 2000, vol.91, 2022, pp.89-112, https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12440. [Google Scholar]
- Bhalerao, Ashwini, et al. “Flapless placement of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation: an innovative technical note”. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol.61, 2023, pp.136-140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.11.282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Panchal, Neeraj, et al. “Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery”. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, vol.31, 2019, pp.539-547, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.08.001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, Yalin, et al. “Evaluation of a dynamic navigation system for training students in dental implant placement”. Journal of Dental Education, vol.85,2020, pp.120-127, https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12399. [Google Scholar]
- Ayoub, Ashraf, and Pulijala Yeshwanth. “The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery”. BMC Oral Health, vol.19, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0937-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Bin-Zhang, and Sun Feng. “A registration-and-fixation approach with handpiece adjustment for dynamic navigation in dental implant surgery”. Heliyon, vol.8, 2022, pp. e10565, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.