Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 195, 2025
2025 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics (ICBEB 2025)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Biomedical Signal Processing and Cognitive State Recognition
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202519501001
Published online 14 November 2025
  • H. Ershaid, M. Lizarazu, D. McLaughlin, M. Cooke, O. Simantiraki, M. Koutsogian-naki, M. Lallier, Contributions of listening effort and intelligibility to cortical tracking of speech in adverse listening conditions, Cortex 172, 54 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • J.A. Müller, D. Wendt, B. Kollmeier, S. Debener, T. Brand, Effect of speech rate on neural tracking of speech, Frontiers in psychology 10, 449 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • L. Decruy, J. Vanthornhout, T. Francart, Hearing impairment is associated with en-hanced neural tracking of the speech envelope, Hearing Research 393, 107961 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Kösem, V. Van Wassenhove, Distinct contributions of low-and high-frequency neural oscillations to speech comprehension, Language, cognition and neuroscience 32, 536 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Gatehouse, W. Noble, The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (ssq), Inter-national journal of audiology 43, 85 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Krueger, M. Schulte, T. Brand, I. Holube, Development of an adaptive scaling method for subjective listening effort, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 4680 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • E.H. Hess, J.M. Polt, Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving, Science 143, 1190 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  • M.B. Winn, J.R. Edwards, R.Y. Litovsky, The impact of auditory spectral resolution on listening effort revealed by pupil dilation, Ear and hearing 36, e153 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Alhanbali, P. Dawes, R.E. Millman, K.J. Munro, Measures of listening effort are multidimensional, Ear and Hearing 40, 1084 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • C.L. Mackersie, N. Calderon-Moultrie, Autonomic nervous system reactivity during speech repetition tasks: Heart rate variability and skin conductance, Ear and Hearing 37, 118S (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • B.T. Paul, J. Chen, T. Le, V. Lin, A. Dimitrijevic, Cortical alpha oscillations in cochlear implant users reflect subjective listening effort during speech-in-noise perception, Plos one 16, e0254162 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • M.G. Wisniewski, A.C. Zakrzewski, Effortful listening produces both enhancement and suppression of alpha in the eeg, Auditory Perception & Cognition 6, 289 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • C. Bernarding, D.J. Strauss, R. Hannemann, H. Seidler, F.I. Corona-Strauss, Neurody-namic evaluation of hearing aid features using eeg correlates of listening effort, Cogni-tive neurodynamics 11, 203 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • P.S. Baboukani, G. Azemi, B. Boashash, P. Colditz, A. Omidvarnia, A novel multi-variate phase synchrony measure: Application to multichannel newborn eeg analysis, Digital Signal Processing 84, 59 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Haro, H.M. Rao, T.F. Quatieri, C.J. Smalt, Eeg alpha and pupil diameter reflect en-dogenous auditory attention switching and listening effort, European Journal of Neuro-science 55, 1262 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Lu, M. Wang, L. Yao, H. Shen, W. Wu, Q. Zhang, L. Zhang, M. Chen, H. Liu, R. Peng et al., Auditory attention decoding from electroencephalography based on long short-term memory networks, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 70, 102966 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Simon, G. Loquet, J. Østergaard, S. Bech, Cortical auditory attention decoding dur-ing music and speech listening, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilita-tion Engineering (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Tanveer, M.A. Skoglund, B. Bernhardsson, E. Alickovic, Deep learning-based auditory attention decoding in listeners with hearing impairment, Journal of Neural Engineering 21, 036022 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Jaeger, B. Mirkovic, M.G. Bleichner, S. Debener, Decoding the attended speaker from eeg using adaptive evaluation intervals captures fluctuations in attentional listen-ing, Frontiers in Neuroscience 14, 603 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • J. Fox, Linear mixed models, Appendix to an R and S-plus Companion to Applied Regression 16, 2349 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • B.T. West, K.B. Welch, A.T. Galecki, Linear mixed models: a practical guide using statistical software (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022) [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Tanveer, J. Jensen, Z.H. Tan, J. Østergaard, Envelope Based Deep Source Sep-aration and EEG Auditory Attention Decoding for Speech and Music, in 2024 32nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (IEEE, 2024), pp. 872–876 [Google Scholar]
  • L. Pion-Tonachini, K. Kreutz-Delgado, S. Makeig, Iclabel: An automated electroen-cephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website, NeuroImage 198, 181 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • P. Shahsavari Baboukani, C. Graversen, E. Alickovic, J. Østergaard, Speech to noise ra-tio improvement induces nonlinear parietal phase synchrony in hearing aid users, Fron-tiers in Neuroscience 16, 932959 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • E.B. Petersen, M. Wöstmann, J. Obleser, S. Stenfelt, T. Lunner, Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions, Frontiers in psychology 6, 177 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Dimitrijevic, M.L. Smith, D.S. Kadis, D.R. Moore, Neural indices of listening effort in noisy environments, Scientific Reports 9, 11278 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • K.E. Mathewson, G. Gratton, M. Fabiani, D.M. Beck, T. Ro, To see or not to see: pres-timulus α phase predicts visual awareness, Journal of Neuroscience 29, 2725 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Johansson, The hilbert transform, Mathematics Master’s Thesis. Växjö University, Suecia. Disponible en internet: http://w3.msi.vxu.se/exarb/mj_ex.pdf, consultado el 19 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • N. Ding, J.Z. Simon, Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening, Journal of neurophysiology 107, 78 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • D.P. Kingma, J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1412.6980 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • P.S. Baboukani, C. Graversen, E. Alickovic, J. Østergaard, EEG phase synchrony re-flects snr levels during continuous speech-in-noise tasks, in 2021 43rd Annual Inter-national Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) (IEEE, 2021), pp. 531–534 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.