Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 195, 2025
2025 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics (ICBEB 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Biomedical Signal Processing and Cognitive State Recognition | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202519501002 | |
| Published online | 14 November 2025 | |
- National Institute of Mental Health, Specific phobia (2022), accessed: 2025-03-31, https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/specific-phobia [Google Scholar]
- Joscha Böhnlein, Luisa Altegoer, Nina Kristin Muck, Kati Roesmann, Ronny Redlich, Udo Dannlowski, Elisabeth J. Leehr, Factors influencing the success of exposure ther-apy for specific phobia: A systematic review, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 108, 796 (2020). 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.009 [Google Scholar]
- D.A. Bernstein, M.T. Nietzel, Behavioral avoidance tests: The effects of demand char-acteristics and repeated measures on two types of subjects, Behavior Therapy 5, 183 (1974). 10.1016/S0005-7894(74)80133-4 [Google Scholar]
- A. Mühlberger, M. Sperber, M. Wieser, P. Pauli, A virtual reality behavior avoidance test (vr-bat) for the assessment of spider phobia, Journal of Cyber Therapy and Reha-bilitation 1, 147 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- H. Schwarzmeier, E.J. Leehr, J. Böhnlein, F.R. Seeger, K. Roesmann, B. Gathmann, M.J. Herrmann, N. Siminski, M. Junghöfer, T. Straube et al., Theranostic markers for personalized therapy of spider phobia: Methods of a bicentric external cross-validation machine learning approach, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 29, e1812 (2020). 10.1002/mpr.1812 [Google Scholar]
- P.J. Castagna, T.E. Davis, M.E. Lilly, The behavioral avoidance task with anxious youth: A review of procedures, properties, and criticisms, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 20, 162 (2017). 10.1007/s10567-016-0220-3 [Google Scholar]
- Wataru Sato, Takanori Kochiyama, Sakiko Yoshikawa, Physiological correlates of sub-jective emotional valence and arousal dynamics while viewing films, Biological Psy-chology 157, 107974 (2020). 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107974 [Google Scholar]
- Sudie E. Back, Ron Acierno, Tanya C. Saraiya, Bill Harley, Bethany Wangelin, Am-ber M. Jarnecke, Lisa M. McTeague, Delisa G. Brown, Elizabeth Santa Ana, Alex O. Rothbaum et al., Enhancing prolonged exposure therapy for ptsd using physiolog-ical biomarker-driven technology, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 28, 100940 (2022). 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100940 [Google Scholar]
- S. Kreibig, Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review, Biological Psy-chology 84, 394 (2010). 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010 [Google Scholar]
- P. Ekman, W. Friesen, Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues (2003). [Google Scholar]
- E.M. Polo, A.V. Rey, M. Mollura, A. Paglialonga, R. Barbieri, Exploring Emotional Responses in Virtual Reality Through Skin Conductance Signal, in 2023 IEEE Interna-tional Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE) (2023), pp. 189–194 [Google Scholar]
- M. Ménard, P. Richard, H. Hamdi, B. Daucé, T. Yamaguchi, Emotion Recognition based on Heart Rate and Skin Conductance., in PhyCS (2015), pp. 26–32 [Google Scholar]
- M. Egger, M. Ley, S. Hanke, Emotion recognition from physiological signal anal-ysis: A review, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 343, 35 (2019), the proceedings of AmI, the 2018 European Conference on Ambient Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2019.04.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Daniel Freeman, Polly Haselton, Jason Freeman, Bernhard Spanlang, Sameer Kishore, Emily Albery, Megan Denne, Poppy Brown, Mel Slater, Alecia Nickless, Automated psychological therapy using immersive virtual reality for treatment of fear of heights: a single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, The Lancet Psychiatry 5, 625 (2018). 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30226-8 [Google Scholar]
- J. Šalkevicius, R. Damaševicˇius, R. Maskeliunas, I. Laukiene˙, Anxiety level recogni-tion for virtual reality therapy system using physiological signals, Electronics 8 (2019). 10.3390/electronics8091039 [Google Scholar]
- F. Grensing, V. Schmücker, A.S. Hildebrand, T. Klucken, M. Maleshkova, Using Phys-iological Data to Evaluate Anxiety Responses During Different Behavioural Avoidance Tests, in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and eXtended and Virtual Reality (AIxVR) (2025), pp. 198–202 [Google Scholar]
- Empatica, E4 wristband | real-time physiological signals | wearable ppg, eda, tempera-ture, motion sensors (15.09.2022), https://www.empatica.com/research/e4/ [Google Scholar]
- Unity, Download unity! (06.08.2022), https://unity3d.com/de/get-unity/download [Google Scholar]
- The professional-grade vr headset | vive pro deutschland (06.08.2022), https://www.vive.com/de/product/vive-pro/ [Google Scholar]
- Florian Grensing, Vanessa Schmücker, Anne Sophie Hildebrand, Tim Klucken, Maria Maleshkova, Frame – a framework for objectively measuring fear based on physio-logical and psychological data, Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering 10, 276 (2024). 10.1515/cdbme-2024-2067 [Google Scholar]
- Mathias Benedek, Christian Kaernbach, A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity, Journal of Neuroscience Methods 190, 80 (2010). 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028 [Google Scholar]
- D. Makowski, T. Pham, Z.J. Lau, J.C. Brammer, F. Lespinasse, H. Pham, C. Schölzel, S.H.A. Chen, Neurokit2: A python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing, Behavior Research Methods 53, 1689 (2021). 10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y [Google Scholar]
- F. Galvão, S.M. Alarcão, M.J. Fonseca, Predicting exact valence and arousal values from eeg, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 21 (2021). 10.3390/s21103414 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.