Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 203, 2025
International Conference Biotechnology on Tropical Environment (ICBTE 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Bio Science → Life Sciences, Biodiversity, and Agricultural Biotechnology | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202520301002 | |
| Published online | 11 December 2025 | |
- Badan Pusat Statistik, Statistik Pertanian 2024. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/ [Google Scholar]
- Badan Pusat Statistik, Laporan Produksi Padi, Cabai, dan Bawang Merah di Indonesia dan Yogyakarta. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/ [Google Scholar]
- Y. Kunimitsu, G. Sakurai, and T. Iizumi, "Systemic risk in global agricultural markets and trade liberalization under climate change: Synchronized crop-yield change and agricultural price volatility," Sustainability, vol. 12, p. 10680, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122410680. [Google Scholar]
- E. Y. Nyamah, Y. Jiang, Y. Feng, and E. Enchill, "Agri-food supply chain performance: An empirical impact of risk," Management Decision, vol. 55, pp. 872891, 2017, doi: 10.1108/MD-11-2016-0784. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Apriyana, N. Hanani, Syafrial, and I.B. Suryaningrat, "Precision agriculture technology and its impact on agricultural productivity in developing countries: A review," IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 892, p. 012033, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/892/1/012033. [Google Scholar]
- S. Saha, K. Jha, and R. Ray, "Integration of IoT, satellite imagery, and fuzzy logic for yield prediction and fertilizer recommendation," Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 218, p. 108675, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2025.108675. [Google Scholar]
- D. C. Rose et al., "Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards effective design and delivery," Agricultural Systems, vol. 149, pp. 165-174, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.009. [Google Scholar]
- M. Michels, V. Bonke, O. Musshoff, and R. Finger, "Understanding the adoption of digital farming technologies: A choice experiment," Agricultural Systems, vol. 177, p. 102706, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102706. [Google Scholar]
- U. Khanal, P. P. Regmi, and K. Alam, "Factors influencing farmers' use of digital agricultural information and services in South Asia," Technology in Society, vol. 67, p. 101754, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101754. [Google Scholar]
- A. Kumar, H. R. Meena, and R. K. Yadav, "Farmers' perception and willingness to adopt digital technologies for sustainable agriculture in India," Sustainability, vol. 15, p. 11025, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151411025. [Google Scholar]
- R. Sulaiman, N. J. Kalaivani, and S. Mittal, "Reimagining agricultural extension through digital advisory services: Lessons from South Asia," Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, vol. 27, pp. 511-529, 2021, doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2021.1936548. [Google Scholar]
- D. Suryani, B. Prasetyo, and T. Haryanto, "Farmer perception on the use of digital platforms for chili farming in Sleman and Bantul, Yogyakarta," Agric. Socio-Econ. J., vol. 21, pp. 145-157, 2021, doi: 10.21082/sosek.v21n3.2021.145-157. [Google Scholar]
- X. Gong, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, and Q. Li, "Digital agriculture adoption and rural revitalization: Evidence from smallholder farmers in China," Land Use Policy, vol. 137, p. 106942, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106942. [Google Scholar]
- T. F. Kolapo, O. R. Adeniyi, and O. Adebayo, "Barriers to digital agriculture adoption among smallholder farmers in Nigeria: Evidence from mobile-based advisory services," Heliyon, vol. 10, p. e27164, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27164. [Google Scholar]
- J. Couturier, Y. H. Abou, and E. Grolleau, Element of Nuclear Safety. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.