Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 226, 2026
The 5th International Seminar on Science and Technology (ISSTEC 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Innovation in Chemical Sciences | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202622602005 | |
| Published online | 06 March 2026 | |
- G.P. Sutton, O. Biblarz, Rocket propulsion elements, (John Wiley and Sons, Canada, 2016) [Google Scholar]
- J. Ashish, G. Swaroop, and K. Balasubramanian, Effect of ammonium perchlorate particle size on flow, ballistic, and mechanical properties of composite propellant, Nanomaterials in Rocket Propulsion Systems, Elsevier, 299-362, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813908-0.00008-3 [Google Scholar]
- G. Gupta, L. Jawale, Mehilal, B. Bhattacharya, Various methods for the determination of the burning rates of solid propellants : an overview, Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater. 12(3), 593-620 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- S. Chaturvedi and P.N. Dave, Solid propellants: AP/HTPB composite propellants, Arabic. J. Chem. 12(8), 2061–2068, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.12.033 [Google Scholar]
- R. Sangtyani, H.S. Saha, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, M. Gupta, and P.V. Chavan, An alternative approach to improve burning rate characteristics and processing parameters of composite propellant, J. Combust. Flame. 209, 357–362, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.04.054 [Google Scholar]
- H. Yaman, V. Çelik, and E. Degirmenci, Experimental investigation of the factors affecting the burning rate of solid rocket propellants, J. Fuel. 115, 794–803, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.033 [Google Scholar]
- A. F. Nour Eldin, W. M. Adel, and A. Elsabbagh, Evaluation of solid propellant burning rate by using strand burner and static firing tests, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2811 012027, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2811/1/012027 [Google Scholar]
- E. Elsaka, S. Elbasuney, H. Mostafa, T. Elhedery, and A. Eldakhakhny, Burning rate measurement of composite propellant using acoustic wave emission in comparison with other techniques, J. Eng. Sci. Mil. Technol. 4(2), 226–232, (2020). https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmtc.2021.64610.1167 [Google Scholar]
- D.R. Lide, CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005). [Google Scholar]
- E.W. Fournier and B.B. Brady, Perchlorate leaching from solid rocket motor propellant in water, J. Propuls. Power. 21(5), 937–941, (2005). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.14246 [Google Scholar]
- B.A. McDonald, J.R. Rice, and M.W. Kirkham, Humidity induced burning rate degradation of an iron oxide catalyzed ammonium perchlorate/HTPB composite propellant, J. Combust. Flame. 161(1), 363–369, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.014 [Google Scholar]
- J.C. Thomas, T.E. Sammet, C.A.M. Dillier, A.R. Demko, F.A. Rodriguez, and E.L. Petersen, Aging effects on the burning rates of composite solid propellants with nano- additives, Jt. Propuls. Conf., 1–15, (2018). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4960 [Google Scholar]
- A. Manash and P. Kumar, Comparison of burn rate and thermal decomposition of AP as oxidizer and PVC and HTPB as fuel binder based composite solid propellants, J. Def. Technol. 15(2), 227–232, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2018.08.010 [Google Scholar]
- S. Park, S. Choi, K. Kim, W. Kim, and J. Park, Effects of ammonium perchlorate particle size, ratio, and total contents on the properties of a composite solid propellant, J. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 45(9), 1376–1381, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202000055 [Google Scholar]
- J. C. Thomas, G. R. Morrow, C. A. M. Dillier, and E. L. Petersen, Comprehensive study of ammonium perchlorate particle size/concentration effects on propellant combustion, J. Propuls. Power 36(1), 95–100, (2020). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B37485 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.