Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 233, 2026
9th International Conference on Advances in Biosciences and Biotechnology: Emerging Innovations in Biomedical and Bioengineering Sciences (ICABB 2026)
Article Number 02009
Number of page(s) 13
Section Environmental Biotechnology and Sustainable Agriculture
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202623302009
Published online 23 April 2026
  • S. Becker & J. Fanzo, Population and food systems: what does the future hold. Pop. and Env., 45(3), 20 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Bhatt & P. Jit, Estimating and Bridging the Yield Gaps in Oilseeds for Atma Nirbhar Bharat. (Agricultural Economics Research Centre, New Delhi, 2022) [Google Scholar]
  • S. Bogati, Impact of Tillage Practices on Water-Use Efficiency of Peanut (Master's thesis, University of Georgia, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  • S. Tripathi, P. Srivastava, R.S. Devi, & R. Bhadouria, Influence of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides on soil health and soil microbiology (Agrochemical Detection & treatment and remediation 25-54, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  • P. Baweja, S. Kumar, & G. Kumar, Fertilizers and pesticides: Their impact on soil health and environment (Soil health 265-285, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  • N. Bisht, & P.S. Chauhan, Excessive and disproportionate use of chemicals cause soil contamination and nutritional stress (Soil contamination-threats and sustainable solutions 1-10, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  • A.K. Singh, P.K. Singh, A. Kumar, PGPR amelioration in sustainable agriculture: food security and environmental management. (Woodhead Publishing, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  • P.K. Rai, V. Kumar, S. Lee, N. Raza, K.H. Kim, Y.S. Ok, D.C. Tsang, Nanoparticle-plant interaction: Implications in energy, environment, and agriculture. Env. Inter., 119, 1–19 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  • G. Vasant, S. Bhatt, R. Raghav, P. Joshi, Revitalization of PGPR through integrating nanotechnology for sustainable development in agriculture (Plant-Microbe Interaction-Recent Advances in Molecular and Biochemical Approaches Academic press 27-248, 2023) [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Altieri, C.I. Nicholls, R. Montalba, Technological approaches to sustainable agriculture at a crossroads: An agroecological perspective. Sustain., 9 (3), 349 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  • A.R. Nayana, B.J. Joseph, A. Jose, E. K. Radhakrishnan, Nanotechnological advances with PGPR applications (Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 41, 163–180, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  • S.A. Gordon, L.G. Paleg, Quantitative measurement of indole acetic acid. Phy. Plant, 10, 37–48 (1957) [Google Scholar]
  • JG. Cappuccino, N. Sherman, Microbiology: a laboratory manual (Pearson Higher Ed; 2013) [Google Scholar]
  • A. Sehrawat, SS. Sindhu, BR. Glick, Hydrogen cyanide production by soil bacteria: Biological control of pests and promotion of plant growth in sustainable agriculture (Pedosphere 32(1),15-38, 2022) [Google Scholar]
  • S. Alstrom, RG, Burns, Cyanide production by rhizobacteria as a possible mechanism of plant growth inhibition. Bio. and Ferti. of Soils., 7(3), 232–8 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  • G. Vasant, S. Bhatt, R. Raghav, Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria from Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) Rhizosphere. Curr. Agri. Research J., 11(1), (2023) [Google Scholar]
  • ML, Jackson, Soil chemical analysis (Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 498, 151–4 1973) [Google Scholar]
  • C. Zhang, F. Kong, Isolation and identification of potassium-solubilizing bacteria from tobacco rhizospheric soil and their effect on tobacco plants, App. soil eco., 1(82)18–25 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  • S. Bhatt, PR. Dholakia, DK. Sorathia, KJ, Solanki, NK, Dabhi, SK, Dedakiya, Isolation & Biochemical Characterization of Halotolerant Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria, The Inter. J. of Sci. and Tech., 3(6), 166 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  • S. Mathivanan, A. A. Chidambaram, P. Sundramoorthy, L. Baskaran, R. Kalaikandhan, Effect of combined inoculations of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Inter. J. of Curr. Micro. and App. Sci, 3(8), 1010–1020 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  • B. Schwyn, JB. Neilands, Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Ana. biochem. 160(1), 47–56 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  • D. Gnanasangeetha, D. Sarala Thambavan, One pot synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles via chemical and green method. Res. J. Mater Sci. 1(7), 1–8 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  • AD. Zand, A.Mikaeili Tabrizi, A. Vaezi Heir, Application of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to promote phytoremediation of Cd-polluted soil: contribution of PGPR inoculation. Biorem. J. 24(2-3),171–89 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  • S. Bhatt, N. Pandhi, R. Raghav, Improved salt tolerance and growth parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) employing Halotolerant Bacillus cereus SVSCD1 isolated from Saurashtra Region, Gujarat. Guj. Ecol. Environ. Cos., 26, 199–212 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • B. Doddavarapu, GL. Crasta, M. Shankar, Comparative studies on chlorophyll concentration in some important plant families. J. of Pharma. and Phytochem. 10(3), 214–20 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhishen, T. Mengcheng, W. Jianming, The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food chem. 64(4), 555–9 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  • LS. Bates, RP. Waldren, ID. Teare, Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. P. and soil. 39(1) 205–207 (1973) [Google Scholar]
  • P. Siddhuraju, K. Becker, Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts of total phenolic constituents from three different agroclimatic origins of drumstick tree (Moringa oleifera Lam.) leaves. J. of agri. and food chem. 51(8), 2144–2155 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  • NP. Bonjoch, PR. Tamayo, Protein content quantification by Bradford method. (Handbook of plant ecophysiology techniques, 283–295, 1976) [Google Scholar]
  • K. Komal, A. Kumar, M.A. Khan, A. Dev, A. Kumar, S. Prasad, N. Ahamad, Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) on chlorophyll content of chickpea plant (Cicer arietinum L.). Pharma Inno. J. 11(4), 1021–1025 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  • S.H. Ham, A.R. Yoon, H.E. Oh, Y.G. Park, Plant growth-promoting microorganism Pseudoarthrobacter sp. NIBRBAC000502770 enhances the growth and flavonoid content of Geum aleppicum. Microorganisms, 10(6), 1241 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  • N. Zainab, A. Abdullah Khan, M. Atif Azeem, B. Ali, et al., PGPR- Mediated Plant Growth Attributes and Metal Extraction Ability of Sesbania sesban L. in Industrially Contaminated Soils, Agron., 11(9), (2021) [Google Scholar]
  • S. I. Warwate, U.K. Kandoliya, N.V. Bhadja, B.A. Golakiya, The effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on biochemical parameters of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) seedling. Inter. J. of Curr. Micro. App. Sci., 6(3), 1935–1944 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  • N. Kumar, G. Kumari, V. Kumar, Enhancing crop productivity and soil health from intercropping coriander with autumn sugarcane through scheduling of fertilizer and irrigation. J. of the Ind. Soc. of Soil Sci., 65(3), 300–307 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.