pyLucXor: A Python Package for Accurate Phosphorylation Site Localization

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 237, 2026 2026 8^th International Conference on Biotechnology and Biomedicine (ICBB 2026)


Article Number		01032
Number of page(s)		5
Section		Molecular and Cellular Pathophysiology
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202623701032
Published online		10 June 2026

S.J. Humphrey, D.E. James, M. Mann, Protein phosphorylation: a major switch mechanism for metabolic regulation. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 26, 676–687 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2015.09.013 [Google Scholar]
J.V. Olsen, B. Blagoev, F. Gnad, B. Macek, C. Kumar, P. Mortensen, M. Mann, Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127, 635–648 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.026 [Google Scholar]
A. Lundby, A. Secher, K. Lage, N.B. Nordsborg, A. Dmytriyev, C. Lundby, J.V. Olsen, Quantitative maps of protein phosphorylation sites across 14 different rat organs and tissues. Nat. Commun. 3, 876 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1871 [Google Scholar]
K. Engholm-Keller, M.R. Larsen, Technologies and challenges in large-scale phosphoproteomics. Proteomics 13, 910–931 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201200484 [Google Scholar]
P.J. Boersema, S. Mohammed, A.J.R. Heck, Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 44, 861–878 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1599 [Google Scholar]
K.A. Ramsbottom, A. Prakash, Y.P. Riverol, O.M. Camacho, M.-J. Martin, J.A. Vizcaino, E.W. Deutsch, A.R. Jones, Method for independent estimation of the false localization rate for phosphoproteomics. J. Proteome Res. 21, 1603 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00827 [Google Scholar]
C. Dai, J. Pfeuffer, H. Wang, P. Zheng, L. Kall, T. Sachsenberg, V. Demichev, M. Bai, O. Kohlbacher, Y. Perez-Riverol, quantms: a cloud-based pipeline for quantitative proteomics enables the reanalysis of public proteomics data. Nat. Methods 21, 1–5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02343-1 [Google Scholar]
D.D. Shteynberg, E.W. Deutsch, D.S. Campbell, M.R. Hoopmann, U. Kusebauch, D. Lee, L. Mendoza, M.K. Midha, Z. Sun, A.D. Whetton, R.L. Moritz, PTMProphet: fast and accurate mass modification localization for the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline. J. Proteome Res. 18, 4262 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00205 [Google Scholar]
M. Locard-Paulet, D. Bouyssie, C. Froment, O. Burlet-Schiltz, L.J. Jensen, Comparing 22 popular phosphoproteomics pipelines for peptide identification and site localization. J. Proteome Res. 19, 1338–1345 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00679 [Google Scholar]
S.A. Beausoleil, J. Villen, S.A. Gerber, J. Rush, S.P. Gygi, A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1285–1292 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1240 [Google Scholar]
T. Taus, T. Kocher, P. Pichler, C. Paschke, A. Schmidt, C. Henrich, K. Mechtler, Universal and confident phosphorylation site localization using phosphoRS. J. Proteome Res. 10, 5354–5362 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/pr200611n [Google Scholar]
D. Fermin, S.J. Walmsley, A.-C. Gingras, H. Choi, A.I. Nesvizhskii, LuciPHOr: algorithm for phosphorylation site localization with false localization rate estimation using modified target-decoy approach. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 3409 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.028928 [Google Scholar]
D. Fermin, D. Avtonomov, H. Choi, A.I. Nesvizhskii, LuciPHOr2: site localization of generic post-translational modifications from tandem mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics 31, 1141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu788 [Google Scholar]
E.W. Deutsch, L. Mendoza, D.D. Shteynberg, M.R. Hoopmann, Z. Sun, J.K. Eng, R.L. Moritz, Trans-Proteomic Pipeline: robust mass spectrometry-based proteomics data analysis suite. J. Proteome Res. 22, 615–624 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00624 [Google Scholar]
H.L. Rost, U. Schmitt, R. Aebersold, L. Malmstrom, pyOpenMS: a Python-based interface to the OpenMS mass-spectrometry algorithm library. Proteomics 14, 74–77 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201300246 [Google Scholar]
J. Pfeuffer, T. Sachsenberg, O. Alka, M. Walzer, A. Fillbrunn, L. Nilse, O. Schilling, K. Reinert, O. Kohlbacher, OpenMS - a platform for reproducible analysis of mass spectrometry data. J. Biotechnol. 261, 142–148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.05.016 [Google Scholar]
R.D. LeDuc, V. Schwammle, M.R. Shortreed, A.J. Cesnik, S.K. Solntsev, J.B. Shaw, M.J. Martin, J.A. Vizcaino, E. Alpi, P. Danis, N.L. Kelleher, L.M. Smith, Y. Ge, J.N. Agar, J. Chamot-Rooke, J.A. Loo, L. Pasa-Tolic, Y.O. Tsybin, ProForma: a standard proteoform notation. J. Proteome Res. 17, 1321–1325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00851 [Google Scholar]
R.D. LeDuc, E.W. Deutsch, P.-A. Binz, R.T. Fellers, A.J. Cesnik, J.A. Klein, T. Van Den Bossche, R. Gabriels, A. Yalavarthi, Y. Perez-Riverol, J. Carver, W. Bittremieux, S. Kawano, B. Pullman, N. Bandeira, N.L. Kelleher, P.M. Thomas, J.A. Vizcaino, Proteomics Standards Initiative’s ProForma 2.0: unifying the encoding of proteoforms and peptidoforms. J. Proteome Res. 21, 1189–1195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00771 [Google Scholar]
Y. Perez-Riverol, C. Bandla, D.J. Kundu, S. Kamatchinathan, J. Bai, S. Hewapathirana, N.S. John, A. Prakash, M. Walzer, S. Wang, J.A. Vizcaino, The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D543–D553 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1011 [Google Scholar]
H. Marx, S. Lemeer, J.E. Schliep, L. Matheron, S. Mohammed, J. Cox, M. Mann, A.J.R. Heck, B. Kuster, A large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 557–564 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2585 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.