Open Access

Table 3.

Average productivity of crop rotations on an eroded slope depending on agrotechnical factors for 2011-2020, t of grain units

Method of basic tillage Fertilizer application rate Crop rotation Fertilizer background average Increase in the productivity of crop rotation in comparison with control,%
A B C B C
Chisel 0 2.50 2.62 2.93 2.68 4.8 17.2
1 3.21 3.31 3.53 3.35 3.1 9.9
2 3.63 3.70 3.96 3.76 1.9 9.1
Average fortillage 3.11 3.21 3.47 3.26 3.2 11.6
Mold board (the control*) 0 2.51 2.70 3.06 2.75 7.6 21.9
1 3.17 3.31 3.64 3.37 4.6 14.8
2 3.56 3.72 4.06 3.78 4.5 14.0
Average fortillage 3.08 3.24 3.59 3.30 5.2 16.5
Average for croprotations 3.01 3.23 3.53 3.26 7.3 17.3
HCP05 = 0.2 t / ha; crop rotation and nutritional level 0.18 t / ha; tillage0.43 t / ha.
*

Note. The productivity of the crop rotation "A" was taken as control.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.