EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 79 (2023) BIO Web Conf., 79 (2023) 13003 References
Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 79, 2023
2nd International Conference on Maritime Education (ICOME 2023)
Article Number 13003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Integrating Environmental Biology into Maritime Education: Strategies and Challenges
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237913003
Published online 08 December 2023
  • J. A. Luft, S. Jeong, R. Idsardi, and G. Gardner, “Literature Reviews, Theoretical Frameworks, and Conceptual Frameworks: An Introduction for New Biology Education Researchers, ” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 21, no. 3, p. rm33, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134. [Google Scholar]
  • C.-A. Chao and N. Myers, “State Biotechnology and Genomic Development: Critical Resources and Barriers, ” Polit. Policy, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 985–1016, 2018, doi: 10.1111/polp.12279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O. C. Ejilibe, “ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN BIOLOGY EDUCATION AS A MEANS FOR EMPLOYMENT, ” Knowl. Rev., vol. 26, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Abreu and V. Grinevich, “Gender patterns in academic entrepreneurship, ” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 763–794, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9543-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. L. Nederhand, H. K. Tabbers, J. Jongerling, and R. M. J. P. Rikers, “Reflection on exam grades to improve calibration of secondary school students: a longitudinal study, ” Metacognition Learn., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 291–317, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11409-020-09233-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. P. Clarke, C. Cornes, and N. Ferry, “The use of self-reflection for enhanced enterprise education: a case study, ” Educ. Train., vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 581–598, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1108/ET-03-2019-0050. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. R. De Leeuw, “Student reflections on the curriculum and citizenship education using card sorting in group settings, ” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 4, p. 100237, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. M. Malkani and J. D. Allen, “Cases in Teacher Education: Beyond Reflection into Practice, ” presented at the the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • W. E. Mok, “Reflecting on reflections: A case study of experienced and inexperienced ESL teachers, ” System, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 93–111, Feb. 1994, doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(94)90043-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Akrami, “The effectiveness of education with the STEM approach in the development of entrepreneurial thinking in chemistry students, ” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 475–485, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D2RP00011C. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Lynch, U. Kamovich, K. K. Longva, and M. Steinert, “Combining technology and entrepreneurial education through design thinking: Students’ reflections on the learning process, ” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 164, p. 119689, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Piperopoulos and D. Dimov, “Burst Bubbles or Build Steam? Entrepreneurship Education, Entrepreneurial SelfEfficacy, and Entrepreneurial Intentions, ” J. Small Bus. Manag., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 970–985, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Pittaway, E. Rodriguez-Falcon, O. Aiyegbayo, and A. King, “The role of entrepreneurship clubs and societies in entrepreneurial learning, ” Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 37–57, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0266242610369876. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. O. Adeniyi, E. Derera, and V. Gamede, “Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy for Entrepreneurial Readiness in a Developing Context: A Survey of Exit Level Students at TVET Institutions in Nigeria, ” SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 215824402210950, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440221095059. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Ketonen and J. H. Nieminen, “Supporting student teachers’ reflection through assessment: The case of reflective podcasts, ” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 124, p. 104039, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. A. Atitsogbe, N. P. Mama, L. Sovet, P. Pari, and J. Rossier, “Perceived Employability and Entrepreneurial Intentions Across University Students and Job Seekers in Togo: The Effect of Career Adaptability and Self-Efficacy, ” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 180, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Çetin and D. Aşkun, “The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsic work motivation, ” Manag. Res. Rev., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 186–201, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Drnovšek, J. Wincent, and M. S. Cardon, “Entrepreneurial self‐efficacy and business start‐up: developing a multi‐ dimensional definition, ” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 329–348, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1108/13552551011054516. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy : The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H Freeman and Company, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • S. A. Ambrose, B. MichaelW. D. Michele, L. Marsha C., and N. Marie K., How Learning Works: Seven ResearchBased Principles for Smart Teaching. in First Edition. United States of America: Jossey-Bass, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Alqahtani and C. Uslay, “Entrepreneurial marketing and firm performance: Synthesis and conceptual development, ” J. Bus. Res., vol. 113, pp. 62–71, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Jones, “Gendered discourses of entrepreneurship in UK higher education: The fictive entrepreneur and the fictive student, ” Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 237–258, May 2014, doi: 10.1177/0266242612453933. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Loi, M. Castriotta, and M. C. Di Guardo, “The theoretical foundations of entrepreneurship education: How cocitations are shaping the field, ” Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 948–971, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0266242615602322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. B. Audretsch, M. Belitski, M. Guerrero, and D. S. Siegel, “ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE UK’S RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNIVERSITY SCHOLARLY OUTPUT AND EDUCATION AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, ” Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 394–421, 2022, doi: 10.5465/amle.2021.0240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. T. Schenkel, R. R. D’Souza, and F. C. Braun, “ENTREPRENEURIAL SELF-EFFICACY, INTENT AND INTENSITY: DOES EXPERIENTIAL TRAINING ENHANCE OR INHIBIT PREDISPOSITION?, ” J. Dev. Entrep., vol. 19, no. 01, p. 1450005, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1142/S1084946714500058. [Google Scholar]
  • C. C. Chen, P. G. Greene, and A. Crick, “Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?, ” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 295–316, Jul. 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00029-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission, Effects and impact of entrepreneurship programmes in higher education. European Union: Entrepreneurship Unit, European Commission, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • W. J. Aloulou, “Predicting entrepreneurial intentions of final year Saudi university business students by applying the theory of planned behavior, ” J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1142–1164, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1108/JSBED-02-2016-0028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Bomani, G. Gamariel, and J. Juana, “University strategic planning and the impartation of technopreneurship skills to students: Literature review, ” J. Gov. Regul., vol. 10, no. 2 Special issue, pp. 196–203, 2021, doi: 10.22495/JJGRV10I2SIART1. [Google Scholar]
  • H. D. Aslam, M. Aslam, N. Ali, and B. Habib, “Importance of Human Resource Management in 21st Century: A Theoretical Perspective, ” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Stud., vol. 3, no. 3, p. 87, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.5296/ijhrs.v3i3.6255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Aghazadeh and F. Zandi, “International growth of SMEs: exploring the effects of adaptive selling, institutional knowledge, innovativeness and opportunity recognition, ” J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1265–1298, 2022, doi: 10.1108/JEEE-02-2021-0051. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.