Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 125, 2024
The 10th International Conference on Agricultural and Biological Sciences (ABS 2024)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Sustainable Agriculture, Soil and Plant Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202412501008
Published online 23 August 2024
  • J. Syvitski, J.R. Ángel, Y. Saito, I. Overeem, C.J. Vörösmarty, H. Wang, D. Olago, Earth’s sediment cycle during the Anthropocene. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3(3), pp.179–196 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Salhi, Y. El Hasnaoui, P. Pérez Cutillas, E. Heggy, Soil erosion and hydroclimatic hazards in major African port cities: the case study of Tangier. Sci. Rep., 13(1), p.13158 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Kariminejad, M. Hosseinalizadeh, H.R. Pourghasemi, A. Bernatek‐Jakiel, M. Alinejad, GIS‐based susceptibility assessment of the occurrence of CCs and pipe collapses in a semi‐arid environment: Golestan Province, NE Iran. Land Degrad. Develop. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • C. Valentin, J. Poesen, Y. Li, Gully erosion: Impacts, factors and control. Catena. 63, 132–153 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhao, Z. Yang, G. Govers, Soil and water conservation measures reduce soil and water losses in China but not down to background levels: Evidence from erosion plot data. Geoderma. 337, 729–741 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Bernatek‐Jakiel, E. Nadal‐Romero, Can soil piping impact environment and society? Identifying new research gaps. Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms, 48(1), pp. 72–86 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. D. Phillips, Changes, perturbations, and responses in geomorphic systems. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 33, 1–14 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Sekkeravani, O. Bazrafshan, H.R. Pourghasemi, A. Holisaz, Spatial modeling of land subsidence using machine learning models and statistical methods. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29(19), pp.28866–28883 (2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Walkley, I.A. Black, 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37(1), pp.29–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Van de Graaff, R.A. Patterson, Explaining the mysteries of salinity, sodicity, SAR and ESP in on-site practice. In On-site ‘01 conference: advancing on-site wastewater systems, University of Armidale, New England, September, pp. 25–27 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Żywiec, M., J. Ledwoń Holeksa, P. Seget, B. Łopata, J.M. Fedriani, Rare events of massive plant reproductive investment lead to long‐term density‐dependent reproductive success. J. Ecol., 106(3), pp.1307–1318 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Getzin, K. Wiegand, J. Schumacher, F.A. Gougeon, Scale-dependent competition at the stand level assessed from crown areas. Forest Ecol. Manag. 255, 2478–2485 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Wiegand, K.A. Moloney, Handbook of spatial point-pattern analysis in ecology. CRC Press, New York, 538 p (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • J. Holden, T.P. Burt, Piping and pipeflow in a deep peat catchment. Catena, 48(3), 163199 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Holden, Sediment and particulate carbon removal by pipe erosion increase over time in blanket peatlands as a consequence of land drainage. J. Geophy. Res.: Earth Surf. 111(F2) (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.