Open Access
Issue
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 178, 2025
International Conference on the Future of Food Science & Technology: Innovations, Sustainability and Health (8th AMIFOST 2025)
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Current Trends in Food Science & Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202517803007
Published online 03 June 2025
  • M. A. R. Mazumder, W. Panpipat, M. Chaijan, K. Shetty, & S. Rawdkuen. Role of plant protein on the quality and structure of meat analogs: A new perspective for vegetarian foods. Future Foods. 8, 100280 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Whitnall, N. Pitts, N. Global trends in meat consumption. Agric. Commodit. 9, 96-99 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • A.M. Salter. The effects of meat consumption on global health. Rev. Off. Int. Epizoot. 37 (1), 47-55 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Sanchez-Sabate, J. Sabate. Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 1220 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Thakur. Sustainable Food Systems (Volume I). World Sustainability Series, Springer, Cham (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • K. Kyriakopoulou, J. K. Keppler, & A.J. van Der Goot. Functionality of ingredients and additives in plant-based meat analogues. Foods, 10(3), 600 (2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • I. Anum, I. Shafeeqa, S. Arooba, K. Nauman. Plantbased meat analogs: A review with reference to formulation andgastrointestinal fate. CRFS. 5, 973-983 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • K. Kołodziejczak, A. Onopiuk, A. Szpicer, A. Poltorak. Meat Analogues in the Perspective of Recent Scientific Research: A Review. Foods. 11, 105 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • V. Bulgaru, M. Mazur, N. Netreba, S. Paiu, V. Dragancea, A. Gurev & A. Ghendov-Mosanu. Characterization of Plant-Based Raw Materials Used in Meat Analog Manufacture. Foods. 14(3), 483 (2025). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Rui, J.I. Boye, S. Ribereau, B.K. Simpson, S.O. Prasher. Comparative study of the composition and thermal properties of protein isolates prepared from nine Phaseolus vulgaris legume varieties. Food Res Int. (44): 2497-2504 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Thakur & V.K. Modi. Emerging Technologies in Food Science - Focus on the Developing World. Springer Nature (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • J. Atukuri, B.B. Odong, & J. H. Muyonga. Multiresponse optimization of extrusion conditions of grain amaranth flour by response surface methodology. Food Science & Nutrition, 7(12), 4147ȓ4162 (2019). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chandla, N. K., Saxena, D. C., & Singh, S. Amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) starch isolation, characterization, and utilization in development of clear edible films. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 41(6), e13217. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • AACC. AACC Method 66-20.01. Determination of granularity of semolina and farina: Sieving method. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis ((11th ed.) American Association of Cereal Chemists International. (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • AACC. General pasting method for wheat or rye flour or starch using the rapid visco analyzer. In American Association of Cereal Chemists International. (1997). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.