Open Access
| Issue |
BIO Web Conf.
Volume 219, 2026
5th International Conference on Food Science and Engineering (ICFSE 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 07001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Sustainable Food Production | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202621907001 | |
| Published online | 11 February 2026 | |
- R. Nabillah, N. U. Fawzi, H. E. Awuh, Rijanta, I. Z. Qurani, Suwardi, N. Danaprita, Exploring the dynamics of supply chain sustainability and resilience in the coconut agriculture: the case of Indragiri Hilir in Indonesia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06756-6. [Google Scholar]
- A. Wahyudi, I. K. Ardana, A. Aunillah, B. Rianto, U. K. Anggoro, A. M. Hasibuan,M. Mardiharini, C. Indrawanto, B. Wardono, Sujianto, Ermiati, B. Sudjarmoko,D. Listyati, Y. Ferry, Building sustainable and resilient coconut supply chains in remote areas:a study from Riau Province – Indonesia. Sustain. Futur. 9, 100709 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100709. [Google Scholar]
- J. Villacide, A. Fuentealba, Perspectives: pests in plantation forests: challenging traditional productive paradigms in the Southern Cone of America. For. Ecol. Manage. 597, 123127 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123127 [Google Scholar]
- R. K. Mitchell, B. R. Agle, D. J. Wood, Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22, 853–886 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/259247 [Google Scholar]
- M. S. Reed, A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 1933–1949 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001. [Google Scholar]
- T. E. Muriuki, O. I. Ayuya, B. O. Oloo, Towards circular production system in the coconut value chain: actor, roles, linkage and constraints in Kilifi County, Kenya. Cogent Soc. Sci. 10, 2362903 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2362903 [Google Scholar]
- R. Kaunang, M. L. G. Taroreh, C. R. Ngangi, Analysis of coconut agribusiness development strategy in North Minahasa Regency. J. Pijar MIPA 10, 4212–4219 (2024). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.8500 [Google Scholar]
- A. Devaux, M. Torero, J. Donovan, D. Horton, Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review. J. Agribus. Dev. Emerg. Econ. 8, 99–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2017-0065 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Seuring, M. Müller, From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 16, 1699–1710 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 [Google Scholar]
- J. M. Bryson, What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Manag. Rev. 6, 21–53 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. B. Rowley, Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22, 887–910 (1997). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 [Google Scholar]
- G. Gereffi, J. Humphrey, T. Sturgeon, The governance of global value chains. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 12, 78–104 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805 [Google Scholar]
- R. W. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Math. Model. 9, 161–176 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 [Google Scholar]
- T. G. Challa, E. B. Dube, I. Dawid, Impact of contract farming on household income, intensification, and land productivity in Ethiopia: Evidence from smallholder malt barley producers in the highlands of the Central and Southern Oromia region. Front. Rev. Environ. Econ. 3, 1415517 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/frevc.2025.1415517 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.