Effects of Using a Back Exoskeleton in Logistics Tasks on Muscle Activity

Open Access

Issue		BIO Web Conf. Volume 237, 2026 2026 8^th International Conference on Biotechnology and Biomedicine (ICBB 2026)


Article Number		03009
Number of page(s)		7
Section		Biomaterials, Medical Devices and Biomedical Engineering
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202623703009
Published online		10 June 2026

Garg, A., Hegmann, K.T., Moore, J.S., Kapellusch, J., Thiese, M.S., Boda, S., Bhoyar, P., Bloswick, D., Merryweather, A., Sese, R., et al. (2013) Study protocol: a prospective cohort study of low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 14: 84. [Google Scholar]
Tang, R., Kapellusch, J.M., Hegmann, K.T., Thiese, M.S., Wang, I., Merryweather, A.S. (2022) Evaluating different measures of low back pain among U.S. manual materials handling workers: comparisons of demographic, psychosocial, and job physical exposure. Hum. Factors, 64(6): 973–996. [Google Scholar]
da Costa, B.R., Vieira, E.R. (2010) Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am. J. Ind. Med., 53(3): 285–323. [Google Scholar]
Sui, Z.H. (2023) Research on legal protection of couriers’ right to rest in the digital age. Shandong University, Jinan. [Google Scholar]
Glock, C.H., Grosse, E.H., Neumann, W.P., Feldman, A. (2021) Assistive devices for manual materials handling in warehouses: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res., 59(11): 3446–3469. [Google Scholar]
Zhu, D.X., Yang, H.T., Hu, Y., Weng, S.F., Zhang, M., Zhang, N.X. (2022) A survey of cervical and lumbar spine diseases of express delivery employees. Chin. J. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Dis., 40(1): 41–44. [Google Scholar]
Wang, Y., Ye, C. (2024) Design of a logistics warehouse robot positioning and recognition model based on improved EKF and calibration algorithm. [Google Scholar]
Grambo, P., Mullick, T., Furukawa, T., Matoba, M., Nasu, Y. (2019) Automatic sorting-and-holding for stacking heterogeneous packages in logistic hubs. [Google Scholar]
Subrahmanyam, R.V., Kiran Kumar, M., Nair, S., Warrier, S., Prashanth, B.N. (2020) Design and development of automatic warehouse sorting rover. [Google Scholar]
Skals, S., Bláfoss, R., Andersen, M.S., de Zee, M., Andersen, L.L. (2021) Manual material handling in the supermarket sector. Part 1: joint angles and muscle activity of trapezius descendens and erector spinae longissimus. Appl. Ergon., 92: 103340. [Google Scholar]
de Looze, M.P., Bosch, T., Krause, F., Stadler, K.S., O’Sullivan, L.W. (2015) Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics, 59(5): 671–681. [Google Scholar]
Viteckova, S., Kutilek, P., Jirina, M. (2013) Wearable lower limb robotics: A review. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., 33(2): 96–105. [Google Scholar]
Anam, K., Al-Jumaily, A.A. (2012) A review of the control system architectures of the existing exoskeleton for last decade. [Google Scholar]
Yan, T., Cempini, M., Oddo, C.M., Vitiello, N. (2015) Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons. Rob. Auton. Syst., 64: 120–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dalboge, A., Frost, J., Grytnes, R., Roy, J.-S., Samani, A., Christiansen, D.H. (2024) Effects of a passive shoulder exoskeleton on muscle activity among Danish slaughterhouse workers. Appl. Ergon., 114: 104111. [Google Scholar]
Le, D.K.L., Lin, W.-C. (2024) Human-exoskeleton cooperation for reducing the musculoskeletal load of manual handling tasks in orchid farms. Comput. Electron. Agric., 219: 108820. [Google Scholar]
Ahmad, J., Fanti, V., Caldwell, D.G., Di Natali, C. (2024) Framework for the adoption, evaluation and impact of occupational Exoskeletons at different technology readiness levels: A systematic review. Rob. Auton. Syst., 179: 104743. [Google Scholar]
Hermens, H.J., Freriks, B., Disselhorst-Klug, C., Rau, G. (2000) Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 10(5): 361–374. [Google Scholar]
Stegeman, D., Hermens, H. (2007) Standards for surface electromyography: the European project Surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscles (SENIAM). In: Standards for Surface Electromyography: The European Project Surface EMG for Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM). Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, pp. 108–112. [Google Scholar]
du Rose, A., Breen, A. (2016) Relationships between paraspinal muscle activity and lumbar inter-vertebral range of motion. Healthcare, 4(1): 4. [Google Scholar]
Vleeming, A., Pool-Goudzwaard, A.L., Stoeckart, R., van Wingerden, J.P., Snijders, C.J. (1995) The posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia: its function in load transfer from spine to legs. Spine, 20(7): 753–758. [Google Scholar]
Mathiassen, S.E., Winkel, J., Hägg, G.M. (1995) Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies — A review. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 5(4): 197–226. [Google Scholar]
So, B.C.L., Hua, C., Chen, T., Gao, Q., Man, S.S. (2022) Biomechanical assessment of a passive back- support exoskeleton during repetitive lifting and carrying: Muscle activity, kinematics, and physical capacity. J. Saf. Res., 83: 210–222. [Google Scholar]
Luger, T., Bär, M., Seibt, R., Rieger, M.A., Steinhilber, B. (2023) Using a back exoskeleton during industrial and functional tasks — effects on muscle activity, posture, performance, usability, and wearer discomfort in a laboratory trial. Hum. Factors, 65(1): 5–21. [Google Scholar]
Huysamen, K., de Looze, M., Bosch, T., Ortiz, J., Toxiri, S., O’Sullivan, L.W. (2018) Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks. Appl. Ergon., 68: 125–131. [Google Scholar]
Wasserstein, R.L., Schirm, A.L., Lazar, N.A. (2019) Moving to a world beyond “p < 0.05”. Am. Stat., 73(suppl 1): 1–19. [Google Scholar]
Alemi, M.M., Madinei, S., Kim, S., Srinivasan, D., Nussbaum, M.A. (2020) Effects of a passive back exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low- back during symmetric lifting. Hum. Factors, 62(3): 458–473. [Google Scholar]
Poliero, T., Lazzaroni, M., Toxiri, S., Di Natali, C., Caldwell, D.G., Ortiz, J. (2020) Applicability of an active back-support exoskeleton to carrying activities. Front. Robot. AI, 7: 579963. [Google Scholar]
von Glinski, A., Yilmaz, E., Mrotzek, S., Marek, E., Jettkant, B., Brinkemper, A., Geßmann, J. (2019) Effectiveness of an on-body lifting aid (HAL for care support) to reduce lower back muscle activity during repetitive lifting tasks. J. Clin. Neurosci., 63: 249–255. [Google Scholar]
Toxiri, S., Koopman, A.S., Lazzaroni, M., Ortiz, J., Power, V., de Looze, M.P., O’Sullivan, L., Caldwell, D.G. (2018) Rationale, implementation and evaluation of assistive strategies for an active back support exoskeleton. Front. Robot. AI, 5: 53. [Google Scholar]
Alemi, M.M., Geissinger, J., Simon, A.A., Chang, S.E., Asbeck, A.T. (2019) A passive exoskeleton reduces peak and mean EMG during symmetric and asymmetric lifting. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 47: 25–34. [Google Scholar]
De Bock, S., Ghillebert, J., Govaerts, R., Elprama, S.A., Marusic, U., Serrien, B., Jacobs, A., Geeroms, J., Meeusen, R., De Pauw, K. (2021) Passive shoulder exoskeletons: more effective in the lab than in the field? IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 29: 173–183. [Google Scholar]
Koopman, A.S., Toxiri, S., Power, V., Kingma, I., van Dieën, J.H., Ortiz, J., de Looze, M.P. (2019) The effect of control strategies for an active back- support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting. J. Biomech., 91: 14–22. [Google Scholar]
Koopman, A.S., Näf, M., Baltrusch, S.J., Kingma, I., Rodriguez-Guerrero, C., Babič, J., de Looze, M.P., van Dieën, J.H. (2020) Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton. J. Biomech., 105: 109795. [Google Scholar]
Zheng, L., Alluri, C.S.V., Hawke, A.L., Hwang, J. (2024) Evaluation of a passive back-support exoskeleton during in-bed patient handling tasks. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 30(4): 1226–1233. [Google Scholar]
Madinei, S., Kim, S., Park, J.-H., Srinivasan, D., Nussbaum, M.A. (2022) A novel approach to quantify the assistive torque profiles generated by passive back-support exoskeletons. J. Biomech., 145: 111363. [Google Scholar]
Baltrusch, S.J., van Dieën, J.H., van Bennekom, C.A.M., Houdijk, H. (2018) The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals. Appl. Ergon., 72: 94–106. [Google Scholar]
Iranzo, S., Belda Lois, J.-M., Martinez de Juan, J.L., Prats Boluda, G. (2023) Assessment of muscle coordination changes caused by the use of an occupational passive lumbar exoskeleton in laboratory conditions. Sensors, 23(24): 9631. [Google Scholar]
Zou, H., Choi, J., Kang, S.H., Kim, S., Jin, S. (2023) Passive exoskeletons alter low back load transfer mechanism. J. Biomech., 147: 111437. [Google Scholar]
Jiang, N., Wang, L., Wang, D., Fang, P., Wu, X., Li, G. (2024) Loading recognition for lumbar exoskeleton based on multi channel surface electromyography from low back muscles. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 71(7): 2154–2162. [Google Scholar]
Schrøder Jakobsen, L.S., Samani, A., Desbrosses, K., de Zee, M., Steinhilber, B., Madeleine, P. (2025) Effects of 24 weeks in field use of a back supporting exoskeleton on biomechanics, work intensity and musculoskeletal discomfort: a randomized controlled trial among logistic workers. Appl. Ergon., 125: 104469. [Google Scholar]
Schrøder Jakobsen, L., de Zee, M., Samani, A., Desbrosses, K., Madeleine, P. (2023) Biomechanical changes, acceptance, and usability of a passive shoulder exoskeleton in manual material handling. A field study. Appl. Ergon., 113: 104104. [Google Scholar]
Hensel, R., Keil, M. (2019) Subjective evaluation of a passive industrial exoskeleton for lower back support: a field study in the automotive sector. IISE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors, 7(3–4): 213–221. [Google Scholar]
Riemer, J., Wischniewski, S. (2023) Long-term effects and user acceptance of back-support exoskeletons in the workplace. Z. Arbeitswiss., 77: 685–691. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.